Searching for the Good Town

EDITORIAL, 25 April 2016

#425 | Johan Galtung

Alfaz, Spain

          You are young people on an EU mission exploring good towns that do not generate violence; 50 of you from 11 towns in 10 countries–and Alfaz del Pi is on the list.  Rightly so, with 105 nations represented–No. 1 Spaniards, No. 2 English, No. 3 Norwegians–with conflicts over incompatible goals, yes, but hurting and harming each other, violence, no.  Remarkable.

L'Alfàs del Pi, Spain

L’Alfàs del Pi, Spain

          A simple theory: if a town makes you feel well, at ease–“it is so easy to live here”, many people say–then something seeps into you and makes you nonviolent.  If the town, your habitat, a key context in your life, hits you badly, then aggression seeps into you, violence may follow, and often across racial or ethnic faultlines.

          So, what is the secret of the good town?  There is much to learn from Alfaz; here is a short list summarizing our experiences:

  • small enough for people to know each other and care for each other;
  • big enough to offer the necessary goods and services; shops etc.;
  • people both live and work here-neither only dormitory nor only work;
  • something for the spirit, like a Casa de Cultura with much going on;
  • something for the body, like sports arenas of all kinds, nice walks;
  • a good natural climate, beauty and green inside and around the town;
  • a good human climate, people with smile and laughter in the streets;
  • plenty of good diverse cafeterias-restaurants at all price levels;
  • plenty of cultural offers like local cinema Royal Opera telecast;
  • not much inequality, class difference with West-East ends far apart.

          The Alfaz my family happened to visit in 1969 was indeed small, with women in black and flies dominating the rush hour traffic. For a bulb we had to go to that Sodoma-Gomorrah called Benidorm (but just people have been located, it has not been destroyed).  With a hidden strength: women, pulling out the chairs for a tertulia, a meeting, at night, distributing resources, like possible gardener jobs, equitably. They met daily doing laundry in the public water fountain, now in private laundry machines; their focus on distribution yielded to a male focus on growth.  Yet Alfaz has kept very much of its charm.  However, let us make a little trip around the world to get more ideas.

          Paris.  Still to some extent a city of small places, quartiers, or at most arrondissements; the catastrophe is the suburban nothingness, the faubourg.  But Mitterrand, socialist with a shady past, had a brilliant idea: socialize means of consumption, not means of production, and the major one is the central place.  Make it accessible, inexpensive, poly-culinary, -glot, -religious, -vestiary; make it beautiful by illumination, use light, and much of it.  And so they did, all over; in super-centralized France Paris is followed.

          Firenze [Florence].  A beautiful central piazza they have, and they made the whole town for pedestrians and bicycles, banning cars (except trucks in the early morning with merchandize and late at night for garbage).  Garages outside charged higher day fees the longer one stayed, railway and bus stations beautiful.  However, a point from Paris: an enormous underground parking garage in the center of Paris, not ugly parking houses all over.  Hide the monsters (but they also have some charm).

          USA.  The Americans share beautiful private gardens with the public by eliminating the fences between the private and the public.  You have a garden?  Make it beautiful, in the public eye, no monopoly.

          The Netherlands.  One step further: big windows, show (off) the beauty of the rooms, with light, paintings.

          China.  Two points.  One modern: the electric, noiseless cars and scooters like for the handicapped in Alfaz. Makes engines acceptable. One traditional: the quarter, six houses back to back around an open square where the private, like a good quarrel, can be shared publicly.  Apartments are the opposite; apartment-ment, only private (apartheid).

          Paraguay, 16th century: no gold and silver to steal, no ports, worthless to Iberian conquerors, so it was given to the Jesuits.  They learnt from the indigenous guaraní the significance of a maximum size of a community, and fixed it at 3,000.  No The Bigger, The Better, no economistic Big Scale Advantages; they can cooperate with neighbors.  You want to settle with us?  Sorry, we are filled up; make your own!

          They had another principle found all over the ancient world: public property, private use.  There is no “land-owner”, the land belongs to all of us and to itself.  However, lots are available for private use; monitored to check that it is well used.  A house stands on public land and it is monitored: it has become an eyesore, fix it within X months or the land is no longer available.  Land that could feed people is left fallow; no longer available for private non-use.

          Thus guided, Paraguay soon developed an agricultural surplus for export, started industrializing, and became the richest part of “Latin America”. Till they competed with English exports and the Minister in Buenos Aires managed to make Argentina-Brazil-Uruguay attack and destroy, making Paraguay one of the poorest.  It still is.

          Nevertheless, the two guiding principles remain, and can be used anywhere.

          From all these ideas around the world, even an Alfaz can learn   something.  Underground parking, free bicycles, electric scooters, not the motorbike monsters now terrorizing the alfazinos. Making a central big plaza French style. More gardens, more sharing.  However,

          Watch Out: Alfaz is getting big; plenty of goods and services but more than necessary.  In addition: the municipality gets much of its income from property tax–the more the better–and in growing may become self-destructive.  Less filled with ease; more stimulating aggression.  There is plenty of space up there on the castillas: build more Alfaz!

          In the meantime, thanks, for all we enjoy in our lovely place.  And for all good ideas around the world that can easily be combined.

______________________________

Johan Galtung, a professor of peace studies, dr hc mult, is founder of the TRANSCEND Network for Peace, Development and Environment and rector of the TRANSCEND Peace University-TPU. He has published 164 books on peace and related issues, of which 41 have been translated into 35 languages, for a total of 135 book translations, including ‘50 Years-100 Peace and Conflict Perspectives,’ published by the TRANSCEND University Press-TUP.

 

This article originally appeared on Transcend Media Service (TMS) on 25 April 2016.

Anticopyright: Editorials and articles originated on TMS may be freely reprinted, disseminated, translated and used as background material, provided an acknowledgement and link to the source, TMS: Searching for the Good Town, is included. Thank you.

If you enjoyed this article, please consider a donation to TMS and click here.

Share or download this article:

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC 4.0 License.


17 Responses to “Searching for the Good Town”

  1. THE ANCIENT TOWN OF ZHOUZHUANG-a town at the border between Jiangsu Province and Shanghai Municipality, covers an area of only 0.47 square km. Sixty percent of the town’s residential houses were build in the Ming and Qing dynasties, and there are close to 100 ancient style housesz, over 60 brick carving gate-towers and 14 ancient bridges of various styles. It is a typical water town in the area south of the Changjiang River, with rivers functioning as streets, linked by bridges, and houses built on waterside. The Town is like a paradise surrounded by modern urban civilization, with its unique aechitectural designes and the simple but refined, easy but not lazy lifestyle.
    documentary in ten language won First World Peace Award 2014 by ONU
    Rosa Dalmiglio delegate by China Ministry of Culture for Peace Comunication

  2. Susanne Urban says:

    PLEASE, remove this line from an article otherwise interesting as usual:
    Holland (right name: Netherlands) “(and they display women who also share the private with the public–)”
    Best regards from a true fan.

    • Hi Susanne. Johan agreed in removing that phrase from the editorial; it was meant to be a little joke [if in bad taste]. He thanks you for the suggestion, also for expressing your opinion in such respectful and positive manner.

      Antonio C. S. Rosa
      Editor

  3. R. Deldano says:

    The USA have killed more than 20 million in 37 countries since WWII. It is high time Galtung reminds us of this awful truth in an editorial. I hope he does so soon: The USA have killed more than 20 million in 37 countries since WWII.

  4. Thomas Krogh says:

    Deldano

    Yeah, I’m also kinda sorry that Galtung is scaling back to only repeating his lie every two weeks or so. It used to much more frequent. Is he getting rusty?

  5. R. Deldano says:

    The USA have killed more than 20 million in 37 countries since WWII.

  6. R. Deldano says:

    Dear TMS staff, this is a very genuine request by a long time reader. Please print tshirts that say “The USA have killed more than 20 million in 37 countries since WWII” and put them on sale to support this site. I’ll buy ten and ask the friends I give them to, to buy ten each and do likewise. So I’ll be waiting. The USA have killed more than 20 million in 37 countries since WWII. This needs to be known.

  7. Thomas Krogh says:

    Deldano (and TMS staff)

    I fully second the suggestion above. I think it will be of great interest to inform the world about Galtung’s lie and that that is fully supported by TMS. You coul also add t-shirt with the various “Rothshild” conspiracy theories and the “understanding” of the warcrimes Russia committed when invading Crimea. Stengthen the brand!

  8. Per-Stian says:

    Thought the line in the original article was quite funny to be honest. It was just an observation, phrased a bit tongue-in-cheek.

    As for the “other thing”; maybe it’s best not to feed the trolls.

  9. Thomas Krogh says:

    Antonio

    Just block me or remove my comments. You did it when I pointed out the 1940 source of the “Rothschild” conspiracy theory in the other thread, so I’m sure you can do it again.

    Better keep TMS as ideologically pure as possible, eh?

  10. R. Deldano says:

    This is hilarious, I had no idea TMS staff could block comments. This is absolutely hilarious, I would have kicked this tool of the site AGES ago. PERMANENTLY. But well I guess peace people have a “live and let live” ethos… even for obvious! trolls.

    • Thomas Krogh says:

      Of course you would Deldano. Nothing like a clean sanitized one-dimensional ideology.

      We know.

  11. Britt Vestergaard says:

    @Antonio

    Given that TMS hosts occational briefs that, at the very least, borders anti-semitism, but at the same time remove comments that points this out, could you not provide guidelines for what you accept and don’t accept?

    I’m aware and accept that TMS cannot carry responsibility for every article posted or re-posted here, but as at least one of the recent ones build an argument around a “Rothschild did it” conspiracy theory directly lifted from a 1940’ies Nazi propaganda movie I find it very strange that the article gets to stay, but comments pointing it our are removed.